泪道激光成形联合逆行植管治疗泪道阻塞护理

泪道激光成形联合逆行植管治疗泪道阻塞护理

黄小花

深圳市龙岗人民医院

收稿日期:2017-08-03 修回日期:2017-09-04 出版日期:2017-11-25
基金资助:
深圳市科技计划项目(项目编号：JCYJ20140414124037446；项目名称：泪道逆行植管临床优化研究)

Nursing Care of Lacrimal Passage Laser Combined with Retrograde Implantation for Obstruction of Lacrimal Duct

huangxiaohua

Received:2017-08-03 Revised:2017-09-04 Online:2017-11-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：研究泪道激光成形联合逆行植管治疗泪道阻塞的护理。方法：选取2016年3月15日至2017年1月10日我科接受治疗的90例泪道阻塞患者，分为观察组和对照组，每组患者各45例。两组患者均行泪道激光成形联合逆行植管治疗后，观察组进行全程护理治疗，对照组进行常规护理治疗，观察统计患者术前术后相关护理评分、术后不良反应发生率及患者对护理治疗的满意度。观察时间均为10个月。结果：两组泪道阻塞患者，在护理评分上，对照组（69.45±77.56）分少于观察组（76.54±82.23）分，有明显差异，具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。在不良反应发生率上，对照组大于观察组，有明显差异，具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。在护理满意度上，对照组少于观察组，有明显差异，具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：泪道激光成形联合逆行植管治疗的泪道阻塞患者进行全程护理后，患者对手术护理的效果比较满意，创伤小，外表美观，术后不良反应明显减少。

Abstract: Objective： To study the nursing care of lacrimal duct obstruction treated with laser forming combined with retrograde implantation of lacrimal duct. Methods： 90 cases of lacrimal duct obstruction from March 15， 2016 to January 10， 2017 treated in our department were classified according to different medical record number for the observation group and control group. Two groups of patients were treated with laser dacryocystoplasty combined with retrograde intubation treatment. The observation group was given entire nursing treatment， and the control group was given routine nursing treatment.The related nursing score and postoperative adverse reaction rate and the satisfaction of patients to nursing were analyzed after treatment. The observation time was 10 months. Results： The two groups of lacrimal obstruction patients on the score of nursing care， the control group(69.45±77.56) was less than the observation group (76.54±82.23)， there were significant differences， with statistical significance(P<0.05). In the incidence of adverse reactions， the control group was greater than the observation group， there were significant differences， with statistical significance(P<0.05). In the nursing satisfaction， the control group was less than the observation group， there were significant differences， with statistical significance(P<0.05). Conclusion： For laser dacryocystoplasty combined retrograde tube grafting treatment of lacrimal duct obstruction patients， nursing effect on patients after surgical nursing is satisfying； trauma， postoperative appearance， postoperative adverse reaction are improved significantly， worthy of clinical expansion.

黄小花. 泪道激光成形联合逆行植管治疗泪道阻塞护理[J]. .

huangxiaohua. Nursing Care of Lacrimal Passage Laser Combined with Retrograde Implantation for Obstruction of Lacrimal Duct[J]. .

参考文献

[1] 蔡建园, 韩永钊. 泪道激光成形术联合逆行泪道置管治疗泪道阻塞的疗效观察[J]. 吉林医学, 2011, 32(32)：6842-6843.
[2] 杨华, 肖湘华, 杨晓钊, 等. 激光联合泪道逆行置管治疗全泪道阻塞的临床观察[J]. 临床眼科杂志, 2012, 20(1)：67-68.
[3] 农义军, 王俊, 温利辉, 等. 高频电灼联合泪道逆行置管术治疗鼻泪管阻塞[J]. 南昌大学学报(医学版), 2012, 52(5)：75-76,79.
[4] 黄河. 激光泪道成形术联合抗代谢药物治疗泪道阻塞临床观察[J]. 临床眼科杂志, 2012, 20(2)：170-171.
[5] 吴爱红, 张保松. 泪道激光联合置管术治疗泪道阻塞性疾病的疗效观察[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2013, 13(8)：1697-1698.
[6] 包永琴,董白霞,任彦新,等. 人工鼻泪管植入术与泪道插管术疗效分析[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志 2015;33(2):160-162.
[7] Hammoudi DS, Tucker NA. Factors associated with outcome of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg ,2011,27(4):266-269.
[8] Yang JW, Oh HN. Success rate and complications of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with unciformectomy[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol,2012,250.(10):1509-1513
[9] Garcia Vilaro M,Visquez L,Marin A,et al. Thermal damage influences endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy success[J].Ophthalmic Res,2013,49(4):209-214.
[10] 罗中伶,张立新,岳耀光,等. 鼻内镜下泪囊鼻腔吻合术中常见问题及处理对策[J]. 国际眼科杂志 ,2014,14(4):771-773.
[11] 李冬梅,丁静文. 外路泪囊鼻腔吻合术是否将被淘汰[J]. 中华眼科杂志 ,2014,50(8):566-568.
[12] 周进,孔庆健,李滨. 两种手术方法治疗慢性泪囊炎的疗效对比[J]. 国际眼科杂志 ,2015;15(3):565-566
[13] 金宝泉,其其格,郭振山,等. 鼻内镜下泪囊鼻腔开窗引流术中Crawford 人工泪管置入观察[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志 ,2015,33 (5) :542-543
[14] 刘东伟,陶黎明,许育新. 鼻内镜下泪囊鼻腔吻合术联合支架置人治疗慢性泪囊炎[J]. 中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志 2015;37(7):497-500
[15] 1王庆华,孙松, 汤伟. 泪道阻塞性疾病置管选择及疗效[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志, 2015,33(2):176-179.
[16] 张扬, 陈绍春, 张帆,等. 复杂性泪道阻塞的手术治疗[J]. 昆明医科大学学报 ,2014,35(2):120-121.
[17] 杨旭, 陈桦, 吕宇,等. 激光联合不同硅胶管植入治疗不同部位泪道阻塞的疗效[J]. 国际眼科杂志 2016,16(1):168-170.
[18] 蔡利梅, 蔡福旭, 陈敏,等. 改良式硅胶管植入治疗泪道阻塞的疗效观察[J]. 微创医学 ,2015, 10(5):604-606.
[19] 张世华, 廖润斌, 徐象周,等. 两种鼻泪管支架置入治疗鼻泪管阻塞的疗效比较[J]. 重庆医学 ,2013, 42(11):1275-1277.
[20] 林峰．小儿先天性泪道阻塞采用泪道探通术治疗的临床效果观察[J]．饮食保健,2015,2(16) : 32-33．

快速检索引用检索图表检索高级检索