• 中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库收录期刊
  • 中文科技期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中国期刊全文数据库收录期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊等

快速检索引用检索图表检索高级检索

中国医药导刊 ›› 2021, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 477-480.

• 管理与实践 • 上一篇    

医药卫生领域课程思政教学效果评价研究

李缘媛1, 赵亮1, 陈佳欣2, 张哲文3, 邢丽娜3, 田金徽3,4*   

  1. 1. 兰州大学循证护理中心, 兰州大学护理学院,甘肃 兰州 730000;
    2. 兰州大学第二临床医学院, 甘肃 兰州 730000;
    3. 兰州大学循证医学中心, 兰州大学基础医学院,甘肃 兰州 730000;
    4. 甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室, 甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-07 修回日期:2021-06-10 出版日期:2021-06-28 发布日期:2021-06-28
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省科技计划项目(项目编号:20CX4ZA027;项目名称:中国循证社会科学发展对策研究);甘肃省高等教育教学成果培育项目(项目编号:202002;项目名称:项目导向·任务驱动·平台支撑——循证医学创新人才培养探索与实践);兰州大学教学改革研究项目[项目编号:JYXM(一般项目-基础)-2020-20195;项目名称:医学课程思政教学效果评价指标体系构建与实证研究];兰州大学教学改革研究项目[项目编号:JYXM(一般项目-基础)-2020-20216;项目名称:教师-学生视角下高等医学教育课程思政建设需求调查研究——以兰州大学为例]

Summary and Analysis of Teaching Effect Evaluation of Ideological and Political Education in the Courses in Medicine and Health Field

  1. 1. Evidence-based Nursing Center, School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China;
    2. The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China;
    3. Evidence-based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China;
    4. Key Laboratory of Evidence-based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province,
         Lanzhou University, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2021-06-07 Revised:2021-06-10 Online:2021-06-28 Published:2021-06-28
  • Contact: Jinhui HuiTian E-mail:tjh996@163.com

摘要: 的:评价分析医药卫生领域“课程思政”的教学效果,探索医药学生课程思政教学实践,为我国开展课程思政教学改革提供参考。方法:计算机检索中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库和CBM数据库获取课程思政研究,采用EndNote软件对文献进行去重和筛选,运用Excel软件和VOSviewer软件绘图。结果:问卷调查法是课程思政教学效果评价最常用的手段,排名第二位的是“三结合”,即问卷调查+形成性评价+终结性评价。结论:课程思政考核标准和评价系统需要进一步完善,单一的终结性评价或问卷调查较难全面反映课程思政的教学效果,亟待探索多维定性和定量、近期和远期、教师和学生评价相结合的教学效果评价体系。

关键词: font-size:medium, ">课程思政;教学效果;评价方法;医药卫生领域

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate and analyze the teaching effect of “ideological and political education in the courses” in the field of medicine and health, and explore the practice of ideological and political education of medical students, to provide reference for carrying out curriculum ideological and political teaching reform. Methods: The CNKI, Wanfang and CBM databases were searched to obtain studies on ideological and political education in the courses. The EndNote software was used to de-duplicate and select, and Excel and VOSviewer were used to draw graphs. Results: Questionnaire survey method is the most common method to evaluate the teaching effect of “ideological and political education in the courses”. The second most common method is the combination of “three methods”, which is questionnaire survey + formative evaluation + summative evaluation. Conclusion: The assessment standards and evaluation systems of ideological and political education in the courses need to be further improved. It is difficult for a single summative evaluation or questionnaire survey to fully reflect the effects of ideological and political education in the courses. It is urgent to explore an effect evaluation system which combines multi-dimensional qualitative and quantitative method, short term and long term evaluation, and the evaluation of both teachers and students.

Key words: font-size:medium, ">Ideological and political education in the courses; Teaching effect; Evaluation method;Medicine and health field

中图分类号: