• 中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库收录期刊
  • 中文科技期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中国期刊全文数据库收录期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊等

快速检索引用检索图表检索高级检索

中国医药导刊 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 581-587.

• 专栏—医药学教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

医药学教育中“形成性评价”教学研究特征分析

张娇燕1, 段丹1, 郭明月2, 吴松霖3, 路文君2, 刑丽娜4, 田金徽4, 5*   

  1. 1. 兰州大学护理学院循证护理中心, 甘肃 兰州 730000;  2. 兰州大学第一临床医学院, 甘肃 兰州 730000;  3. 兰州大学第二临床医学院, 甘肃 兰州 730000;  4. 兰州大学基础医学院循证医学中心, 甘肃 兰州 730000;  5. 甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室, 甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-15 出版日期:2022-06-28 发布日期:2022-06-28
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省科技计划项目(项目编号:20CX4ZA027;项目名称:中国循证社会科学发展对策研究);甘肃省高等教育教学成果培育项目(项目编号:202002;项目名称:项目导向·任务驱动·平台支撑——循证医学创新人才培养探索与实践);教育部产学合作协同育人项目(项目编号:202101062024;项目名称:基于超星“一平三端”平台的线上线下混合一流循证医学课程群建设与实践);教育部产学合作协同育人项目(项目编号:202102511005;项目名称:基于“互联网+AI医学教育”的医学证据检索课程群建设与实践)

Analysis on the Characteristics of “Formative Assessment” in Medical Education

  1. 1.Evidence-based Nursing Center,School of Nursing, Lanzhou University,Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China; 2.The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China;  3.The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China;  4.Evidence-based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China;  5.Key Laboratory of Evidence-based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2022-08-15 Online:2022-06-28 Published:2022-06-28

摘要: 目的:分析探讨医药学教育中“形成性评价”教学元素的特征,以期为我国开展教学评价改革提供借鉴和参考。方法:检索中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、中国生物医学文献数据库及维普资讯网,获取医药学教育领域“形成性评价”教学研究,筛选后应用Excel软件提取所纳入研究中的“形成性评价”元素信息并进行描述性分析。通过MindMaster和GraphPad Prism软件分别绘制思维导图和柱状图,采用VOS viewer软件生成聚类图进行可视化分析。结果:形成性评价教学法在课堂应用较临床教学应用多,该部分成绩在总成绩中的占比以40%、50%居多;考核元素种类覆盖较广,前3名分别为考勤、作业和课堂表现;应用策略包括第一课堂、第二课堂、第三课堂等。形成性评价教学常与问题教学法和案例教学法联合应用,依靠网络教学平台辅助以及建立即时通讯交流平台来协助达成教学评价,多通过问卷调查法开展教学效果评价。结论:形成性评价教学注重教学过程的动态评价和指导,有助于“教学相长”,值得在医学理论和实践教学中推广应用。

关键词: font-size:medium, ">形成性评价;医学教学;考核评价;教学效果

Abstract: Objective:To provide reference for teaching evaluation reform by analyzing the characteristics of formative assessment teaching elements in the field of medical education. Methods:CNKI,Wanfang,CBM and VIP databases were retrieved to obtain the literatures on teaching research of "formative evaluation"in the field of medical education. After screening, Excel software was used to extract the element information of "formative assessment" and conduct descriptive analysis.Mind Master and GraphPad Prism software were used to draw mind maps and histograms respectively, and cluster diagrams were generated by VOS viewer software for visual analysis.Results: The formative assessment teaching method was applied more in the classroom teaching than in the clinical teaching.The proportion of formative assessment score in the total score was mostly 40% or 50%.The types of assessment elements covered a wide range,and the top three were attendance, homework and classroom performance. The application strategies included First Classroom, Second Classroom, Third Classroom, etc. Formative assessment teaching was often combined with the problem-based learning method and case-based learning method,relying on the assistance of the network teaching platform and the establishment of instant communication platform to assist teaching evaluation,and questionnaire survey method was often carried out to evaluate teaching effect. Conclusion: The formative assessment teaching focuses on the dynamic evaluation and guidance during the teaching process, which is conducive to "teaching and learning", and is worthy of popularization and application in medical theory and practice teaching.

Key words: font-size:medium, ">Formative assessment;Medical education;Assessment and evaluation;Teaching effect

中图分类号: