• 中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库收录期刊
  • 中文科技期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中国期刊全文数据库收录期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊等

快速检索引用检索图表检索高级检索

中国医药导刊 ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (10): 1064-1070.

• 管理实践 • 上一篇    下一篇

中医药领域卫生经济评价方法应用现状研究

尚文茹1,2,3, 刘雨佳4, 魏莉莉5, 卢存存6, 袁澜斌1,吕文娜1, 牛军强3,7, 葛龙1,2,3, 李秀霞1,2,3, 杨克虎1,2,3*
  

  1. 1.兰州大学基础医学院循证医学中心, 甘肃 兰州 730000;
    2.甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室, 甘肃 兰州 730000;
    3.兰州大学第一医院协同创新基地, 甘肃 兰州 730000;
    4.甘肃中医药大学第一临床医学院, 甘肃 兰州 730000;
    5.甘肃中医药大学经贸与管理学院, 甘肃 兰州 730000;
    6.中国中医科学院中医临床基础医学研究所, 北京100700;
    7.兰州大学第一医院中医科, 甘肃 兰州 730000

  • 收稿日期:2023-03-14 修回日期:2023-05-30 出版日期:2023-10-28 发布日期:2023-10-28
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省自然科学基金(项目编号:22JR5RA510;项目名称:中药复方制剂治疗高血压病的临床综合评价研究)

Research on the Application Status of Health Economic Evaluation Methods in the Field of Traditional Chinese Medicine#br#

  1. 1.Evidence-based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China;
    2.Key Laboratory of Evidence-based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China;
    3.Collaborative Innovation Center of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China;
    4.The First School of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China;
    5.School of Business and Management, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China;
    6.Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China;
    7.Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2023-03-14 Revised:2023-05-30 Online:2023-10-28 Published:2023-10-28

摘要: 目的: 通过分析当前卫生经济评价方法在中医药领域的应用现状,为中医药领域卫生经济学研究提供参考和方向。方法:计算机检索中英文文献数据库(CBM、CNKI、Wanfang Data、PubMed、the Cochrane Library、Web of Science),筛选中医药领域应用经济学评价方法的研究文献并提取相关信息,采用定性分析方法进行描述。结果本研究共纳入166篇相关文献。首篇研究文献于2004年发表,随后发表研究数量逐年增多。国内研究主要分布在广东省(30篇,18.07%)、北京市(14篇,8.43%)和四川省(12篇,7.23%),且研究机构主要是广州中医药大学和中国中医科学院。所研究疾病主要以神经系统疾病(46篇,27.71%)为主,如脑血管疾病中的缺血性脑卒中、脑梗塞等。纳入研究类型以随机对照试验(121篇,72.89%)为主。研究方法以成本-效果分析为主(141篇,84.94%);成本计算以直接医疗成本为主(122篇,73.49%);临床效果评价指标以研究拟定的中医临床症状判断为主(64篇,38.55%),采用生存质量评价标准的研究仅有12篇(7.22%)。结论:我国中医药领域的卫生经济评价研究起步较晚且存在研究地域分布不均衡现象,采用的卫生经济评价方法较单一,评价标准和体系尚不成熟,有必要优化中医药卫生经济研究的区域发展状况,并结合中医药自身发展规律与特点探索和建立有效的中医药卫生经济评价体系,推动我国中医药事业的发展。

关键词: 中医药, 卫生经济评价, 成本-效果分析, 成本-效益分析, 成本-效用分析, 最小成本分析

Abstract: Objective: By analyzing the current application status of health economic evaluation methods in the field of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM), this study aims to provide reference for the researches of health economics in the field of TCM. Methods: Databases including CBM, CNKI, Wanfang Data, PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were electronically searched to collect literatures on the application of economic evaluation methods in the field of TCM. Qualitative descriptive analysis was performed after relevant information was extracted from the included literatures. Results: A total of 166 related literatures were included. The first study was published in 2004, and the number of published studies increased year by year. Domestic studies were mainly distributed in Guangdong province (30, 18.07%), Beijing (14, 8.43%) and Sichuan province (12, 7.23%), and the research institutions were mainly Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine and China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences. The diseases studied were mainly nervous system diseases (46, 27.71%), such as cerebrovascular diseases (ischemic stroke, cerebral infarction, et al). Most of the included studies were randomized controlled trials (121, 72.89%). The main research method was cost-effectiveness analysis (141, 84.94%).The direct medical cost was the main cost calculation item (122, 73.49%). The evaluation index of clinical effect was mainly based on the clinical symptoms of TCM (64, 38.55%), and only 12 studies (7.22%) adopted the Quality of Life (QOL) evaluation criteria. Conclusion: The research on health economic evaluation in the field of TCM in China started relatively late, and its geographical distribution is uneven. Furthermore, the health economic evaluation method adopted is single, and the evaluation standard and system are still immature. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the regional development status of TCM health economic research and explore and establish an effective TCM health economic evaluation system based on the characteristics of TCM, so as to promote the development of TCM in China.

Key words: Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), Health economic evaluation, Cost-effectiveness analysis, Cost-benefit analysis, Cost-utility analysis, Minimum cost analysis

中图分类号: