• 中国核心期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中文科技期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中国期刊全文数据库收录期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊等

快速检索引用检索图表检索高级检索

中国医药导刊 ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 205-209.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

83例药物性肝损伤回顾性分析及保肝药的应用分析

  田娜妮1, 何青青1*, 朱琳1, 姚杨2, 惠娇娇1, 梁乐1, 白婷1, 杨蕊1, 李霄1   

  1. 1.咸阳市第一人民医院药学部临床药学室, 陕西 咸阳 712000;
    2.西安医学院第一附属医院, 陕西 西安 710077
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-03 修回日期:2023-01-14 出版日期:2023-02-28 发布日期:2023-02-28
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省重点研发项目(项目编号: 2020SF-156;项目名称:ROS调节NEK-NLRP3在迷迭香酸保护肝损伤中的作用及机制)

Retrospective Analysis of 83 Cases of Drug-Induced Liver Injury and Application of Hepatoprotective Drugs

  1. 1.Department of Pharmacy, The First People′s Hospital of Xianyang, Shaanxi Xianyang 712000, China;
    2. The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi′an Medical College, Shaanxi Xi′an 710077, China
  • Received:2022-11-03 Revised:2023-01-14 Online:2023-02-28 Published:2023-02-28

摘要: 目的:研究药物性肝损伤的诱发药物、临床特点,分析保肝药应用的合理性,为临床药师进一步指导临床用药提供依据。方法:回顾性分析我院2018—2021年诊断为药物性肝损伤患者的临床特征及保肝药的应用。结果:共纳入83例患者,其中男性39例(46.98%),女性44例(50.57%), 18~44岁病例较多,共32例(38.55%); 43例(51.81%)无明显临床症状,其余患者临床症状与一般肝损伤无差异。引起药物性肝损伤排名前三位的药物为中药(24例,28.92%),抗肿瘤药(12例,14.46%),抗感染药物(10例,12.05%);药物性肝损伤最常见的分型为肝细胞损伤型(38例,81.92%);40例患者的Roussel Uclaf因果关系评估法(RUCAM)评分结果为可能(48.19%);严重程度分级1级68例(81.93%);治疗后74例(89.16%)好转。81例患者(97.59%)应用保肝药,9例患者预防性应用保肝药,其余患者为治疗性应用,26例患者联合应用3种及以上保肝药。应用的药物以多烯磷脂酰胆碱注射液、注射用还原谷胱甘肽、甘草酸制剂为主,极少数患者应用糖皮质激素。结论:引起药物性肝损伤种类较多,临床表现缺乏特异性。用药期间应监测肝功能,尽早发现并及时干预。临床药师应熟悉药物性肝损伤的临床特征和防治措施,掌握药物治疗的方案,在DRGs 改革的背景下提供专业的用药指导。
     [关键词]

关键词: font-size:medium, ">药物性肝损伤;RUCUM评分;保肝药;合理用药;DRGs

Abstract: Objective:To explore the inducing drugs and clinical characteristics of drug-induced liver injury, analyze the rationality of the application of liver protection drugs, and provide references for clinical pharmacists to guide clinical medication. Methods:The clinical features of patients diagnosed with drug-induced liver injury in our hospital from 2018 to 2021 and the application of hepatoprotective drugs were retrospectively analyzed. Results:A total of 83 cases of drug-induced liver injury were included, among which 39 cases(46.98%) were male and 44 cases(50.57%) were female. 32 cases(38.55%) were 18 to 44 years old. 43 cases(51.81%) had no obvious clinical symptoms, and the clinical symptoms of the rest patients were not different from the general liver injury. The top three drugs causing drug-induced liver injury were traditional Chinese medicine(24 cases, 28.92%), antineoplastic drugs(12 cases,14.46%) and anti-infective drugs(10 cases,12.05%). The most common type of drug-induced liver injury was hepatocyte injury(38 cases,81.92%). The RUCAM score of 40 cases(48.19%) were “probable”.68 cases(81.93%) were grade 1 hepatic injury. 74 cases(89.16%) improved after treatment.81 patients(97.59%) received hepatoprotective drugs, 9 patients received prophylactic therapy, and the rest received therapeutic drugs. 26 patients were treated with three or more hepatoprotective drugs. The main drugs used were polyene phosphatidylcholine injection, reduced glutathione for injection,glycyrrhizic acid preparation, and glucocorticoid was used in very few patients. Conclusion:There are many kinds of drug-induced liver injury and the clinical manifestation lack of specificity. Liver function should be monitored during treatment, with early detection and timely intervention. Clinical pharmacists should be familiar with the the clinical characteristics and prevention and treatment measures of drug-induced liver injury, and provide professional medication guidance under the background of DRGs reform.

Key words: font-size:medium, ">Drug-induced liver injury; RUCAM score; Hepatoprotective drugs; Rational medicine; DRGs

中图分类号: