腹横肌平面阻滞用于肾移植术后镇痛有效性和安全性的Meta分析

中国医药导刊 ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (8): 826-832.

腹横肌平面阻滞用于肾移植术后镇痛有效性和安全性的Meta分析

陈依欣1，邓进1，李丽1，朱琳2*

南华大学衡阳医学院附属第一医院肾内科1，麻醉科2，湖南衡阳 421000

收稿日期:2023-04-12 修回日期:2023-06-08 出版日期:2023-08-28 发布日期:2023-08-28
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目（项目编号：82100804；项目名称：miR-204-5p通过负向调节IL-11自分泌前馈环路抑制慢性移植肾失功早期炎症细胞浸润的机制研究）；湖南省自然科学基金面上项目（项目编号：2022JJ30525；项目名称：IL-11通过自分泌前馈环路激活ERK1/2-Snail信息通路介导慢性移植肾失功肾间质纤维化）；湖南省卫生健康委员会科技计划项目（项目编号：20201940；项目名称：基于尿液细胞外囊泡的特发性膜性肾病诊断生物标志物的筛查和验证）

Efficacy and Safety of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Analgesia after Renal Transplantation： A Meta-analysis

Department of Nephrology1， Department of Anesthesiology2， the First Affiliated Hospital of Hengyang Medical College，
University of South China， Hunan Hengyang 421000， China

Received:2023-04-12 Revised:2023-06-08 Online:2023-08-28 Published:2023-08-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：系统评价腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)用于肾移植术后镇痛的有效性和安全性，以期为肾移植术后镇痛方案提供参考。方法：计算机检索PubMed、Embase和 Cochrane、知网、万方、维普网数据库，搜集TAPB用于肾移植术后镇痛相关的随机对照试验，检索时限均从建库至2022年3月。由2位评价员独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后，采用Review Manager 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果：共纳入10个随机对照试验（RCT），共503例患者。Meta分析结果显示：与对照组相比，TAPB组术后24 h视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分更低[SMD=-0.88，95%CI(-1.34~-0.42)，P=0.000 2]，术中芬太尼[SMD=-3.41，95%CI(-6.07~-0.74)，P=0.01]和术后芬太尼[SMD=-3.57，95%CI(-6.30~-0.84)，P=0.01]、吗啡[SMD=-4.85，95%CI(-7.64~-2.06)，P=0.0006]的用量更少。此外，两组患者术后胃肠道不良反应发生率[RR=1.03，95% CI(0.42~2.50)，P=0.96]及术后24 h血肌酐水平[SMD=-1.02，95%CI(-3.28~1.23)，P=0.37]差异无统计学意义。结论：现有证据表明，TAPB用于肾移植术后镇痛有效性好，安全性高，但仍需更多高质量研究进一步验证。

关键词: font-size:medium, ">腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)；肾移植；术后疼痛；Meta分析

Abstract: Objective： To systematically review the efficacy and safety of transversus abdominis plane block（TAPB） for analgesia after renal transplantation， in order to provide reference for analgesia after renal transplantation. Methods： PubMed， EMBASE， and Cochrane， CNKI， Wanfang， and VIP databases were searched by computer to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to TAPB for postoperative analgesia after kidney transplantation. The search time was from the database establishment to April 2022. After 2 reviewers independently screened the literature， extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies， Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 software. Results： A total of 10 RCTs with a total of 503 patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with the control group， the TAPB group had a lower VAS pain score at 24 h after operation [SMD=-0.88，95%CI(-1.34--0.42)， P=0.000 2]， intraoperative fentanyl [SMD=-3.41，95%CI (-6.07--0.74)， P=0.01]，postoperative fentanyl [SMD=-3.57， 95%CI (-6.30--0.84)， P=0.01]， and postoperative morphine [SMD=-4.85， 95%CI (-7.64--2.06)， P=0.0006] Use less. In addition， the incidence of postoperative gastrointestinal adverse reactions [RR=1.03， 95%CI (0.42-2.50)， P=0.96] and the 24 h postoperative serum creatinine level [SMD=-1.02， 95%CI (-3.28-1.23) ]， P=0.37] of the two groups had no statistical difference. Conclusion： Existing evidence shows that TAPB is effective and safe for postoperative analgesia after kidney transplantation， but more high-quality studies are still needed for further verification.

Key words: Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB), Kidney transplantation, Postoperative pain, Meta-analysis

中图分类号:

陈依欣, 邓进, 李丽, 朱琳. 腹横肌平面阻滞用于肾移植术后镇痛有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中国医药导刊, 2023, 25(8): 826-832.

CHEN Yixin, DENG Jin, LI Li, ZHU Lin. Efficacy and Safety of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Analgesia after Renal Transplantation： A Meta-analysis[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL GUIDE, 2023, 25(8): 826-832.

参考文献

[1]Ahmed A， Latif N， Khan R. Post-operative analgesia for major abdominal surgery and its effectiveness in a tertiary care hospital[J]. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol， 2013， 29(4)：472-477.
     [2]Viderman D， Tapinova K， Nabidollayeva F， et al. Intravenous versus epidural routes of patient-controlled analgesia in abdominal surgery： systematic review with meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Med， 2022， 11(9)：2579.
     [3]李莞盈，丁文刚，李文志. 腹横肌平面阻滞应用于腹部器官移植手术后镇痛的进展[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志， 2015， 21(9)：697-700， 703.
     [4]Mavarez AC， Ahmed AA： Transabdominal Plane Block[M]. In： Stat Pearls. edn. Treasure Island (FL)： StatPearls Publishing，2022.
     [5]Carney J， McDonnell JG， Ochana A， et al. The transversus abdominis plane block provides effective postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy[J]. Anesth Analg， 2008， 107(6)：2056-2060.
     [6]Belavy D， Cowlishaw PJ， Howes M， et al. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Caesarean delivery[J]. BrJAnaesth， 2009， 103(5)：726-730.
     [7]Conaghan P， Maxwell-Armstrong C， Bedforth N， et al. Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane blocks in laparoscopic colorectal resections[J]. Surg Endosc， 2010， 24(10)：2480-2484.
     [8]Sandeman DJ， Bennett M， Dilley AV， et al. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks for laparoscopic appendicectomy in children： a prospective randomized trial[J]. Br J Anaesth， 2011， 106(6)：882-886.
     [9]Ying J， Jiang C， Xu C， et al. Utility of transversus abdominis plane block on patients undergoing transanal total mesorectal excision[J]. Pak J Med Sci， 2023， 39(2)：518-523.
     [10]Abdildin Y， Tapinova K， Nugumanova M， et al. Transversus abdominis plane block in adult open liver surgery patients： a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Visc Surg， 2023， 160(4)：253-260.
     [11]咸淑悦，张婧婧，李卉，等. 腹横肌平面阻滞对肾移植术后镇痛及肾功能的影响[J]. 贵州医科大学学报， 2018， 43(9)：1084-1087， 1104
     [12]Freir NM， Murphy C， Mugawar M， et al. Transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia in renal transplantation： a randomized controlled trial[J]. Anesth Analg， 2012， 115(4)：953-957.
     [13]Hosgood SA， Thiyagarajan UM， Nicholson HF， et al. Randomized clinical trial of transversus abdominis plane block versus placebo control in live-donor nephrectomy[J]. Transplantation， 2012， 94(5)：520-525.
     [14]Sussan SM， Arman D， Gita S. Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block for acute postoperative pain relief in kidney recipients： a double-blinded clinical trial[J]. Pain Med， 2014， 15(3)：460-464.
     [15]宋来青. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞用于活体肾移植术后疼痛中的镇痛效果观察[D]. 浙江：浙江大学， 2016.
     [16]Carrie C， Quinart A， Gille O， et al. Postoperative diaphragmatic paralysis after kidney transplantation[J]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim， 2011， 30(12)：939-941.
     [17]黄以庭，冯雅薇，沈宁，等. 超声引导下腹横筋膜平面阻滞应用于肾移植围术期的镇痛效果评价[J]. 现代医院，2018，18(12)：1833-1836.
     [18]郑晓静.超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞联合羟考酮超前镇痛在肾移植手术中的应用[D]. 安徽：安徽医科大学， 2019.
     [19]商丽梅.王慎会.冯海. 不同浓度罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞在肾移植术后镇痛中的应用[J]. 2018， 5(10)：82-84.
     [20]Yang P， Luo Y， Lin L， et al. The efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block with or without dexmedetomidine for postoperative analgesia in renal transplantation. a randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Surg， 2020， 79：196-201.
     [21]Abramyan S， Hanlon M. Kidney transplantation[M]. In： StatPearls. edn. Treasure Island (FL)： StatPearls Publishing， 2022.
     [22]Yoshida T， Furutani K， Watanabe Y， et al. Analgesic efficacy of bilateral continuous transversus abdominis plane blocks using an oblique subcostal approach in patients undergoing laparotomy for gynaecological cancer： a prospective， randomized， triple-blind， placebo-controlled study[J]. BritishJAnaesthesia， 2016， 117(6)：812-820.
     [23]Hernandez MC， Panchamia J， Finnesgard EJ， et al. Transversus abdominis plane blocks with liposomal bupivacaine after open major hepatectomy is associated with reduced early patient-reported pain scores and opioid administration[J]. Surgery， 2018， 164(6)：1251-1258.
     [24]刘文斌，刘晶，张继青.全麻联合腹横肌平面阻滞对肝癌切除患者镇痛效果及肾功能的影响[J]. 甘肃医药， 2021， 40(4)：315-317.
     [25]Han K， Zhang Y， Bai R， et al. Application of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block combined with nalbuphine patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in postoperative analgesia after laparotomy： a randomized controlled trial[J]. Pain and Therapy， 2022， 11(2)：627-641.
     [26]杨静，江帆. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞对腹腔镜肾切除术中循环应激及术后镇痛的影响[J]影像研究与医学应用， 2021， 5(1)：249-250.
     [27]李静，赵艳波. 超声引导下腹横平面阻滞对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛效果的影响[J]中国药物与临床， 2020， 20(10)：1705-1706.

快速检索引用检索图表检索高级检索