• 中国核心期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中文科技期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中国期刊全文数据库收录期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊等

快速检索引用检索图表检索高级检索

中国医药导刊 ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (12): 1285-1285-1292.doi: magtech.2025.09.30-00001

• 临床医药 • 上一篇    下一篇

甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚用于腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术患儿全身麻醉效果的比较

范高飞, 郑客松, 王洪涛, 韩明明, 李娟, 康芳*   

  1. 中国科学技术大学附属第一医院/安徽省立医院麻醉科,安徽 合肥 230001
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-30 修回日期:2025-10-22 接受日期:2025-12-24 出版日期:2025-12-28 发布日期:2026-01-26
  • 基金资助:
    科技创新2030-“脑科学与类脑研究”重大项目(2021ZD0203100)

Comparison of Remimazolam Tosilate and Propofol for General Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic High Ligation of the Hernial Sac

FAN Gaofei, ZHENG Kesong, WANG Hongtao, HAN Mingming, LI Juan, KANG Fang*   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC/Anhui Provincial Hospital Anhui Hefei 230001, China
  • Received:2025-09-30 Revised:2025-10-22 Accepted:2025-12-24 Online:2025-12-28 Published:2026-01-26
  • Supported by:

摘要:

目的:比较静脉麻醉药甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚在儿童腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的临床应用效果及围术期安全性。方法:纳入20243~11月在我院接受择期腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术的602~6岁、ASA分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ级患儿,随机分为瑞马唑仑组(R组,n=30)和丙泊酚组(P组,n=30)。R组采用甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑(以下简称瑞马唑仑)复合舒芬太尼、顺阿曲库铵进行麻醉诱导,维持阶段持续输注瑞马唑仑与瑞芬太尼;P组使用丙泊酚联合相同辅助药物实施麻醉。术毕所有患儿均转入麻醉后恢复室(PACU)观察。主要终点为镇静成功率,次要终点包括诱导期的血流动力学变化(平均动脉压、心率、指脉博氧饱和度)、围术期时间指标(手术时间、麻醉时间、喉罩拔除时间、意识恢复时间、PACU停留时间)以及围术期不良事件发生情况。结果:R组镇静成功率与P组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。R组诱导期T1T2时间点的MAP均高于P组(P<0.05)。两组在围术期时间指标及术后不良事件发生率方面比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:瑞马唑仑用于2~6岁小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术全身麻醉时,其麻醉效能与丙泊酚相当,且能提供更平稳的诱导期血流动力学状态,可作为该年龄段腹腔镜手术全身麻醉的一种安全、可行的替代方案。


关键词: 瑞马唑仑, 丙泊酚, 儿童麻醉, 腹股沟疝, 血流动力学稳定性

Abstract:

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosilate versus propofol in general anesthesia for pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic high ligation of the hernial sac.Methods: Sixty children aged 2 to 6 years classified as ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ who underwent laparoscopic high ligation of the hernial sac under laryngeal mask general anesthesia in our hospital from March 2024 to November 2024 were included and randomly divided into the remimazolam group group Rn=30 and the propofol group group Pn=30. In group R anesthetic induction utilized remimazolam tosilate hereinafter referred to as remimazolam), sufentanil and cisatracurium with maintenance via remimazolam and remifentanil infusion. Group P received propofol sufentanil and cisatracurium for induction followed by propofol and remifentanil maintenance. After the openation all patients were transferred to the post-anesthesia care unit PACU for recovery management. The primary outcome was the sedation success rate. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic parameters MAP HR SpO2 during induction operative duration anesthesia duration time of laryngeal mask removal time of consciousness recovery PACU discharge time and the incidence of adverse events.Results: The sedation success rate in group R was not statistically different from that in group P P > 0.05. The MAP at T1 and T2 time points during induction in group R was higher than that of group P P < 0.05. No statistically significant differences were observed in recovery time laryngeal mask removal time PACU stay duration or the incidence of postoperative adverse events P>0.05.Conclusions: Remimazolam demonstrates non-inferior efficacy to propofol for general anesthesia in children aged 2-6 years undergoing laparoscopic high ligation of the hernial sac with superior hemodynamic stability during induction. These findings support remimazolam as a safe and viable alternative for general anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery in this pediatric population.


Key words: Remimazolam , Propofol , Pediatric anesthesia , Inguinal hernia , Hemodynamic stability

中图分类号: