• 中国核心期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中文科技期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中国期刊全文数据库收录期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊等

快速检索引用检索图表检索高级检索

• 投稿 • 上一篇    下一篇

国外医学领域专家系统的研究主题与研究者合作能力分析

施树珍,蔡润津,苟铃珠,杨克虎,王建成,张俊华,田金徽   

  1. 兰州大学循证医学中心,兰州大学循证医学中心,兰州大学基础医学院,兰州大学第二临床医学院,兰州大学循证医学中心,兰州大学基础医学院, 甘肃省智慧医学工程实验室,兰州大学,甘肃省人民医院,天津中医药大学循证医学中心,兰州大学循证医学中心,兰州大学基础医学院, 甘肃省智慧医学工程实验室,兰州大学
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-17 修回日期:2018-05-17 出版日期:2018-08-25
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省智慧医疗工程实验室开放基金(项目编号:20170102;项目名称:人工智能在医学领域的应用);甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室开放基金(项目编号:20170203;项目名称:循证医学方法学研究);甘肃省人民医院院内科研项目(项目编号:17GSSY2-7)

Analysis on the Research Topic and Researcher Cooperation Ability of Expert Systems Studies in Medical Field in Foreign Countries

SHI Shuzhen,CAI Runjin,GOU Lingzhu,YANG Kehu,WANG Jiancheng,ZHANG Junhua and TIAN Jinhui   

  1. Evidence-based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences,兰州大学循证医学中心,兰州大学基础医学院,兰州大学第二临床医学院,兰州大学循证医学中心,兰州大学基础医学院, 甘肃省智慧医学工程实验室,兰州大学,甘肃省人民医院,天津中医药大学循证医学中心,兰州大学循证医学中心,兰州大学基础医学院, 甘肃省智慧医学工程实验室,兰州大学
  • Received:2018-05-17 Revised:2018-05-17 Online:2018-08-25

摘要: 目的:对国外人工智能专家系统的研究主题与研究者合作能力进行可视化分析,以期为学者开展医学领域专家系统相关研究提供借鉴和参考。方法:通过检索PubMed数据库,纳入国外专家系统相关研究,采用书目共现分析系统(BICOMS-2)分析软件对主要信息进行提取和整理,并对高频作者和主题词生成共现矩阵,利用NetDraw绘制网络关系图,利用gCLUTO进行聚类分析。结果:共纳入3 254篇文献,42个国家参与了专家系统外文研究的发表,主要集中在欧洲和北美洲,刊载相关研究的1 031种期刊载文量存在明显差异,作者之间存在一定的联系,但合作不够紧密,聚类分析发现研究主题主要有3个。结论:国外专家系统研究的作者和国家存在不平衡性,作者之间的交流需进一步增加,国家之间的合作需进一步加强。研究的主题较局限,仍需进一步拓展

Abstract: Objective:To analyze the current research status of research topic and the researcher cooperation ability of expert systems in foreign medical field,so as to provide reference for expert system researchers to carry out relevant research in medical field. Methods:Foreign researches on expert systems were included by searching PubMed. BICOMS-2 software was adopted to extract the main information and produce matrix. The figure of network was produced by NetDraw, and cluster analysis was performed by gCLUTO. Results:A total of 3 254 studies of expert systems were included.42 countries participated in publishing the expert system studies of foreign language,mainly concentrated in Europe and North America. The number of related researches published in the 1 031 related journals was imbalance. There was a certain relationship between the authors, but cooperation was not quite close. There were three main research topics. Conclusion:There are imbalance in the number authors and countries participated in expert system studies. The cooperation between the authors and between the countries need to be further strengthened. The subject of the studies is limited and needs further expansion.