• 中国核心期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中文科技期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中国期刊全文数据库收录期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊等

快速检索引用检索图表检索高级检索

中国医药导刊 ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2): 114-118.

• 专栏:药物临床试验 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于德尔菲法和层次分析法构建研究者发起临床研究立项评估体系

周颖1, 李玉艳2, 徐蕾1, 刘坤1, 宁仁利1*   

  1. 1.上海市质子重离子医院/上海市放射肿瘤学重点实验室/上海质子重离子放射治疗工程技术研究中心研发部,上海 201321;
    2.上海市生物医药技术研究院/国家卫生健康委员会计划生育药具重点实验室,上海 200237
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-04 修回日期:2024-02-02 出版日期:2024-02-28 发布日期:2024-02-28
  • 基金资助:
    上海市申康医院发展中心第二轮《促进市级医院临床技能与临床创新三年行动计划》研究型医师创新转化能力培训项目(SHDC2022CRS054);上海市医院协会医院管理研究基金(X2021078)

Establishment of Project Evaluation System for Investigator Initiated Trial Based on Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process

  1. 1.Research and Development Department Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center/Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation
    Oncology/Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy Shanghai 201321,China
    2.Shanghai Institute for Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies/NHC Key Lab of Reproduction Regulation
    Shanghai 200237, China
  • Received:2023-09-04 Revised:2024-02-02 Online:2024-02-28 Published:2024-02-28

摘要:

目的:围绕研究者发起的临床研究项目,探索建立科学合理的立项评估指标体系,使科研管理部门的决策更具科学性。方法:通过文献查阅、专题小组讨论等方法拟定评估体系框架。运用德尔菲法构建评估体系,采用层次分析法确定各指标的权重。结果:本次共邀请了10位专家进行了2轮问卷调查。5个一级指标权重从高到低依次为立项依据(0.398 1)、研究基础(0.212 7)、研究内容(0.204 1)、研究方案(0.105 7)、预期产出和效益(0.079 4)。二级指标中,组合权重最高的前3位分别是“研究背景是否论述清晰”(0.229 3), “研究现状是否调研全面”(0.128 4)和“前期研究基础是否扎实”(0.110 0)。结论:本次通过德尔菲法和层次分析法构建的研究者发起临床研究立项评估体系具有较好的科学性和合理性,可为科研管理部门开展立项管理提供参考。


关键词: 研究者发起的临床研究, 立项评估, 德尔菲法, 层次分析法

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the establishment of a scientific and reasonable evaluation system for investigator-initiated trials so as to make the decision-making of scientific research management departments more scientific.Methods: The framework of evaluation system was developed through literature review and focus group discussion. Delphi method was used to build an evaluation system Analytic Hierarchy Process AHP was used to determine the weights of each indicator.Results: Ten experts were invited and two rounds of expert consultation was carried out. According to the weight 5 indicators in the first level were the project basis 0.398 1), research foundation 0.212 7), research content 0.204 1), research plan 0.105 7 and expected output and effect 0.079 4. Among indicators in the second level the top three were as follows whether the research background was discussed clearly 0.229 3), whether the research status was comprehensive 0.128 4 and whether the preliminary research foundation was solid 0.110 0.Conclusion: The evaluation system of investigator-initiated trials was established by Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process with favorable scientific and rational senses can provide a reference for management department.


Key words: Investigator initiated trial , Project evaluation , Delphi method , Analytic hierarchy process

中图分类号: