• 中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库收录期刊
  • 中文科技期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中国期刊全文数据库收录期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊等

快速检索引用检索图表检索高级检索

中国医药导刊 ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1): 53-58.

• 管理与实践 • 上一篇    下一篇

COMET数据库核心指标集研究现状剖析


  

  1. 1. 兰州大学循证护理中心,兰州大学护理学院  2. 兰州大学循证医学中心,兰州大学基础医学院

  • 收稿日期:2019-12-13 修回日期:2020-03-05 出版日期:2020-01-31 发布日期:2020-03-20
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目

Study on the Current Situation of the Core Outcome Set Researches Based on COMET Database

  1. 1. Evidence-based Nursing Center, School of Nursing, Lanzhou University  2. Evidence-based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University
  • Received:2019-12-13 Revised:2020-03-05 Online:2020-01-31 Published:2020-03-20
  • Contact: Jin HuiTian E-mail:tjh996@163.com
  • Supported by:
    中医临床试验核心指标集(COS-TCM)构建方法

摘要: 目的:通过分析COMET数据库核心指标集(core outcome set,COS)研究,了解COMET数据库COS研究的现状,并为我国学者开展COS研究提供参考。方法:检索COMET数据库获取COS研究,利用Web of Science获取纳入COS研究的时间、期刊、作者、研究机构、国家和关键词信息,采用VOSviewer软件对COS研究的相关信息进行提取,并对国家、研究机构和作者生成合作网络图,对关键词进行聚类分析。结果:共纳入COS研究896篇,发文量最多的国家为美国(446篇),发文量最多的机构为多伦多大学(58篇),5 213位作者、2 428个研究机构、77个国家参与了COS研究的发表。国家、主要研究机构和主要作者分别形成了3、3和6个团体,研究主题主要有4个。结论:开展COS研究的国家、研究机构和作者之间需要加强合作,同时加强对COS方法学研究。

Abstract: Objective:To analysis the core outcome set (COS) researches, in order to explore the current situation of COS researches and provide reference for researcher to carry out related researches. Methods: COS researches were obtained by searching COMET database, the Web of Science was used to obtain the publication year, journals, authors, organizations and countries of included COS researches. The VOS viewer software was used to extract the related information, and generate visual cooperation network maps for the country, organizations and authors, perform cluster analysis for keywords. Results: 896 COS researches were included, the countrise with the largest number of publications is the United States (446 articles), the institution with the largest number of publications is University of Toronto(58 articles), and 5 213 authors, 2 428 organizations and 77 countries were involved in the publication of the included COS researches. The countries, main institutions formed three research teams respectively, and the main authors formed six cooperative groups. There were four main research topics. Conclusion:There is enough room for the cooperation between different countries, institutions and authors, and further research should focus on the methodology of COS.

中图分类号: