• 中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库收录期刊
  • 中文科技期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中国期刊全文数据库收录期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊等

快速检索引用检索图表检索高级检索

中国医药导刊 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (9): 897-902.

所属专题: 医药学专栏

• 专栏:医药学教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国、美国、日本医药学教学相关专利对比分析

赵亮1, 路文君2, 李艳明3, 赵晓云3, 胡芷若3, 田金徽4,5*   

  1. 1.兰州大学护理学院, 甘肃 兰州 730000;  2.兰州大学第一临床医学院, 甘肃 兰州 730000; 3.甘肃中医药大学护理学院, 甘肃 兰州 730000; 4.兰州大学基础医学院,兰州大学循证医学中心, 甘肃 兰州 730000; 5.甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室, 甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-15 修回日期:2022-10-09 出版日期:2022-09-28 发布日期:2022-09-28
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省科技计划项目(项目编号:20CX4ZA027;项目名称:中国循证社会科学发展对策研究);教育部产学合作协同育人项目(项目编号:202101062024;项目名称:基于超星“一平三端”平台的线上线下混合一流循证医学课程群建设与实践);教育部产学合作协同育人项目(项目编号:202102511005;项目名称:基于“互联网+AI医学教育”的医学证据检索课程群建设与实践);甘肃省高等教育教学成果培育项目(项目编号:202002;项目名称:项目导向·任务驱动·平台支撑——循证医学创新人才培养探索与实践)

Comparative Analysis of Medical Teaching-related Patents in China, the United States and Japan

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China; 2. The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China; 3. School of Nursing, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China; 4. Evidence-based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China; 5. Key Laboratory of Evidence-based Medicine and Knowledge Translation in Gansu Province, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2022-08-15 Revised:2022-10-09 Online:2022-09-28 Published:2022-09-28

摘要: 目的:了解我国医药学教学相关专利现状,对比美国和日本相关专利申请情况,对我国医药学教学相关专利申请中的现有问题提出解决建议,以提升高质量专利占比。方法:本研究以Innojoy专利数据库作为数据来源,全面检索2002—2021年中国、美国、日本医药学教学相关专利。采用Excel 2019与Origin 2021进行数据分析和结果呈现。结果:中国、美国、日本在2002—2021年间医药学教学相关专利申请数量分别为3895、2502、1152件。中国医药学教学相关发明专利申请数量为2229件(57.23%)、实用新型专利1666件(42.77%);美国、日本医药学教学相关专利申请均以发明专利为主(分别为100.00%、98.70%)。国内38.98%的医药学教学相关专利处于有权状态,美国处于有权状态的医药学教学相关专利为51.28%,日本为44.22%。中国、美国、日本医药学教学相关专利申请数量最多的申请人分别为上海理工大学(14件)、加州大学(36件)、飞利浦电子公司(23件)。中国、美国和日本医药学教学相关专利申请IPC大类种类数量/申请量比值分别为61/3895(1.58%)、54/2502(2.16%)和28/1152(2.43%);IPC小类种类数量/申请量比值分别为142/3895(3.65%)、118/2502(4.72%)和57/1152(4.95%);IPC大组种类数量/申请量比值分别为417/3895(10.71%)、356/2502(14.23%)和177/1152(15.36%);IPC小组种类数量/申请量比值分别为1006/3895(25.83%)、999/2502(39.93%)和473/1152(41.06%)。日本和中国超过一半的医药学教学相关专利未被其他专利引用过,而美国医药学教学相关专利仅有23.70%未被引用。中国医药学教学相关专利中,不到10%在5个以上国家提交了专利申请(美国为27.51%,日本为42.97%),超过10项权利项数的专利占14.02%(日本占62.89%、美国占82.65%)。结论:我国医药学教学相关专利申请数量持续上升,申请量位居全球首位,但是专利质量仍需进一步提高。
  

关键词: font-size:medium, ">中国;医药学;教学;专利

Abstract: Objective:To understand the current status of medical teaching-related patents in China, compare with the United States and Japan, and make suggestions to solve the existing problems of patent applications in China, so as to improve the proportion of high-quality patents. Methods: Innojoy patent database was used as the data source to comprehensively search the medical teaching-related patents of China, the United States and Japan during 2002-2021. Excel 2019 and Origin 2021 were used for data analysis and results presentation. Results:The numbers of medical teaching-related patent applications in China, the United States, and Japan during 2002-2021 were 3895, 2502, and 1152, respectively. The number of medical teaching-related invention patent applications in China was 2229(57.23%), and the number of medical teaching-related utility model patents in China was 1666(42.77%), while medical teaching-related patent applications in the United States and Japan were dominated by invention patents(100.00% and 98.70%respectively). 38.98% of medical teaching-related patents were in the authorized status in China. 51.28% of medical teaching-related patents were in the authorized status in the United States and 44.22% in Japan. The applicants with the highest number of patent applications in China, the United States and Japan were University of Shanghai for Science and Technology(14), University of California(36) and Philips Electronics Co.(23), respectively. The category number/application quantity ratio of IPC Class of medical teaching-related patents in China, the United States and Japan were 61/3895(1.58%), 54/2502(2.16%) and 28/1152(2.43%), respectively. The category number/application quantity ratio of IPC Subclass in China, the United States and Japan were 142/3895(3.65%), 118/2502(4.72%) and 57/1152(4.95%), respectively.The category number/application quantity ratio of IPC Main Group in China, the United States and Japan were 417/3895(10.71%), 356/2502(14.23%) and 177/1152(15.36%), respectively. The category number/application quantity ratio of IPC Subgroup in China, the United States and Japan were 1006/3895(25.83%), 999/2502(39.93%) and 473/1152(41.06%),respectively. More than half of medical teaching-related patents in Japan and China have not been cited by other patents, and only 23.70% of medical teaching-related patents in the United States have not been cited. Less than 10% of Chinese medical teaching-related patents were filed in more than five countries(compared to 27.51% in the United States and 42.97%in Japan). Patents with more than 10 rights accounted for 14.02% in Chinese medical teaching-related patents(compared to 62.89% in Japan and 82.65% in the United States). Conclusion: The number of medical teaching-related patent applications in China continued to rise, and the application quantity ranked the first in the world, but the quality of patents still needs to be further improved.

Key words: China, Medicine, Teaching, Patents

中图分类号: