• 中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库收录期刊
  • 中文科技期刊数据库收录期刊
  • 中国期刊全文数据库收录期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库统计源期刊等

快速检索引用检索图表检索高级检索

中国医药导刊 ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2): 73-80.

所属专题: "新冠肺炎防控"专栏

• 新型冠状病毒肺炎专栏 •    下一篇

基于VOSviewer冠状病毒中、外文研究主题对比分析

高亚1,张俊华2,田金徽1,王菁3, 刘依嘉4,刘湘国4   

  1. 1. 兰州大学循证医学中心,兰州大学基础医学院
    2. 天津中医药大学循证医学中心
    3. 北京大学医院
    4. 兰州大学第二临床医学院
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-13 出版日期:2020-02-29 发布日期:2020-03-24
  • 基金资助:
    天津中医药大学科技专项;甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室应急科研专项

Comparative Analysis of Research Topics of Chinese and Foreign Coronavirus Study Based on VOSviewer

  • Received:2020-02-13 Online:2020-02-29 Published:2020-03-24
  • Contact: Jin HuiTian E-mail:tjh996@163.com
  • Supported by:
    新型冠状病毒感染应急防治;新型冠状病毒感染肺炎防控

摘要: 目的:利用文献计量学方法对冠状病毒中、外文研究的主题进行对比分析,以期为冠状病毒研究的发展提供借鉴。方法:通过检索中国生物医学文献数据库和Embase数据库,获取冠状病毒文献研究的相关信息。用VOSviewer 1.6.13软件对纳入研究的发表年代、期刊、作者和关键词进行提取,并生成高产作者的合作网络图和高频关键词的聚类网络图。结果:最终纳入20 129篇研究,冠状病毒外文研究最早发表于1951年,中文研究最早发表于1981年,2003年发文量大幅度增加。刊载冠状病毒研究的期刊有3 021种,但高产的期刊较少。前10位外文高产作者中,有4个来自美国,5个来自中国。前10位中文高产学者中,4个来自中国农业科学院哈尔滨兽医研究所。主要中文作者形成12个合作团体,主要外文作者形成7个合作团体,不同团体之间合作不多。冠状病毒中文研究主要有5个主题,外文研究主要有4个主题。结论:冠状病毒研究的数量在2003年迅速增长,此后年发文量波动不定。美国和中国在该领域处于相对领先的地位,各合作团体内部成员之间合作相对紧密,不同团体之间的合作稀疏,需要加强不同国家、不同地区之间的合作。国内外冠状病毒研究的主题基本相同,均为不同冠状病毒的检测、基因组序列分析、疫苗的研制及导致相应疾病的防控和治疗。

Abstract: Objective: To compare the topics of Chinese and foreign coronavirus research using bibliometric methods, in order to promote the development of coronavirus research. Methods: The Chinese biomedical literature database and Embase database were searched to obtain the relevant information of the coronavirus literature. VOSviewer 1.6.13 was used to extract the publication years, journals, authors, and keywords of the included studies, and generate a cooperative network diagram of high-yielding authors and a cluster network diagram of high-frequency keywords. Results: 20 129 studies were finally included. The first study of coronavirus in foreign languages was published in 1951, the first study in Chinese language was published in 1981, and the number of publications increased significantly in 2003. There are 3 021 journals covering coronavirus research, but few high-yielding journals. Of the top 10 authors of foreign language studies, 4 were from the United States and 5 were from China. Of the top 10 authors of Chinese studies, 4 were from the Harbin Veterinary Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. The main Chinese authors formed 12 cooperative groups, and the main foreign language authors formed 7 cooperative groups. The cooperation among different groups was not close. There were mainly 5 topics in Chinese coronavirus research and 4 topics in foreign coronavirus research. Conclusion:The number of coronavirus studies increased rapidly in 2003 and subsequent annual publications fluctuated. The United States and China are in a relatively leading position in this field. The cooperation between members within each group is relatively close, and cooperation between different groups is sparse. Cooperation between different countries and regions needs to be strengthened. The research topics of Chinese and foreign coronavirus research are generally the same, which are the detection and genome sequence analysis, vaccine development of coronaviruses, and prevention and treatment of coronavirus-related diseases.

中图分类号: